Monday, April 21, 2025

Summer 3rd Quarter 2001 July-September

 

JULY 2001

 10 July 2001 Tuesday

Correction: Civil rights attorney Brian Barnard argues that prosecution of sodomy between unmarried, consenting adults is a violation of privacy and free expression. An article in Tuesday's edition of The Salt Lake Tribune was unclear on that point.  Case May Test Laws On Sodomy Utah County man is first to be charged in decades;  Sex Case May Force Change in Law
BY MICHAEL VIGH   THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE
Teen-ager Derrick Sundquist admitted to having consensual oral sex with a 16-year-old girl last year  --  and became the first Utah man in several decades to be charged with sodomy.
   The prosecution of the American Fork man, now 21, could open the door for a successful challenge of Utah's anti-sodomy laws, according to a Salt Lake City civil-rights attorney who has fought to overturn the statute for more than a decade.
   In recent years, several Utah judges have tossed out lawsuits challenging sodomy and fornication laws, saying that because people are seldom, if ever, prosecuted, plaintiffs are not in imminent danger of going to jail for having intimate sexual relations.
   "The judges have said there is no real threat and, therefore, it's a theoretical debate," said attorney Brian Barnard, who has filed an amicus brief in Sundquist's case on behalf of the Utah Civil Rights and Liberties Foundation Inc.
   Sundquist, then 19, was charged last year with class B misdemeanor sodomy for having oral sex with a 16-year-old girl. Although prosecutors allege the girl performed fellatio on Sundquist at his home last year, she has not been charged with a similar crime.
   Sundquist was also charged with several other misdemeanors, including possession of a controlled substance, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and unlawful possession of alcohol for the same incident.
   Sundquist's attorney, Laura Cabanilla, has filed a motion to dismiss the sodomy charge, arguing the law is an unconstitutional violation of her client's rights of free expression. She also claims that because no one has been charged with sodomy for decades, her client is being singled out for prosecution.
   "It would be one thing if people were regularly charged with this crime, but no one has been charged for years," Cabanilla said. "It's a little silly that they would try to prosecute someone for having oral sex performed on them."
   Cabanilla said Sundquist was charged after the girl told police they had consensual oral sex on May 5, 2000. Police were investigating an unrelated crime when they interviewed the girl. Cabanilla argues Sundquist was also charged because he hates the police and is "mouthy and has an attitude. He can get pulled over for speeding and end up going to jail for resisting arrest," Cabanilla said.
   Cabanilla added that she could not find a single instance where a person has been charged in decades with sodomy. During a motion hearing in American Fork next week, Cabanilla plans to call prosecutors from Salt Lake County, Utah County, Orem, Provo and Spanish Fork to ask them if they have ever charged anyone with sodomy.
   "I have already asked them and they've all said 'no,' " she said. "This is clearly a case of selective prosecution."
   American Fork City Attorney Tucker Hansen did not return calls seeking comment.
   Utah law forbids "any sexual act with an [unmarried] person . . . involving the genitals of one person and the mouth or anus of another person, regardless of the sex of either participant."
   Sodomy was outlawed even for married couples until 1977, when the law was changed to include only the unmarried. People convicted of sodomy face up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine.
   The girl, at 16, is legally able to consent to sex with a peer, although unmarried people who engage in intercourse can be charged with fornication.
   In his friend of the court brief, Barnard argues that the prosecution of sodomy between unmarried, consenting adults is a violation of privacy and free expression. He says that sexual acts are the most meaningful way one person expresses love to another.
   In the past 15 years, Barnard has also tried to overturn Utah's anti-fornication statutes that ban sex between unmarried, consenting adults. Four unmarried Utahns  --  known only by their initials  --  have sued to scrap the laws, saying they feared being jailed for having intimate relations.
   Last year, U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart dismissed the case, ruling the plaintiffs could not prove they were in immediate threat of being prosecuted. In March, Barnard appealed the ruling before a three-judge panel of Denver's 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
   The panel took the oral arguments under advisement. It is not known when it will rule.
   The anti-fornication and sodomy laws have been stricken in some states by judges who have deemed them unconstitutional. Lawmakers in other states have scrapped the laws while overhauling their criminal code and killing outdated, unenforced laws.
   Barnard is convinced it will be a court, not Utah lawmakers, that eventually removes the laws.
   mvigh@sltrib.com

 

11 July 2001Wednesday

Numbers Reveal a Boom In Same-Sex Households Gay, Lesbian Households on Increase in Utah BY JOE BAIRD   THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE
Salt Lake City residents Colleen Sandor and Melanie Hamilton wanted their partnership to count, so they filled out the new same-sex household category on the 2000 census form.
   "We want to be taken into consideration in the overall scheme of things," Hamilton said. "We want to be validated for who we are."
   So did many other gay and lesbian couples.
   New census figures released today show a staggering increase in the number of households with gay and lesbian partners, and there are not many places where that growth is as apparent as in Utah.
   The state's number of reported same-sex households has grown from 401 to 3,370 in the past decade, a 740 percent jump that is surpassed only by Delaware's 781 percent among the 20 states whose figures have been released so far. National numbers have yet to be released.
   "We knew there would be an increase, but this is a surprise," said Paula Woolf, director of the Gay and Lesbian Community Center in Salt Lake City. "What it shows is that despite efforts to rescind the rights of gays and lesbians, people are more comfortable about declaring themselves as lesbian or gay, and there was a trust in the confidentiality of the census."
   Nobody is claiming Utah's gay and lesbian population has grown more than sevenfold in the past 10 years. At least part of the increase is attributed to the presence of the same-sex household category on the short form; the 1990 count was based on sampling from the long form. Also credited is a nationwide campaign that exhorted gays and lesbians to take advantage of the census-form changes.
   But the quantum leap in the same-sex households also indicates a growing willingness by gays and lesbians to stand up and be counted, particularly in less-populous states.
   "Utah is part of an interesting pattern," said David Elliot, spokesman of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "The more populated urban states tend to have increases of 100 to 300 percent, while the more rural states are seeing much larger increases."
   Yet, for all that, gay and lesbian activists suspect there remains a significant undercount of their overall numbers.
   "It's a massive undercount," Elliott said. "Many gays and lesbians still feel uncomfortable about filling out the census form. And since not all gays and lesbians are in relationships, they're not counted."
   Still, the significant census increase confirms what Utah gays and lesbians have suspected for some time: that their numbers are growing.
   Salt Lake City resident Sandor says she has noticed that just through increasing popularity of the annual gay pride celebration, which drew nearly 30,000 people earlier this year.
   "That's been one of the biggest indications that people are more comfortable about coming out in the open and being seen, where we might have been afraid of doing that in the past for fear of retaliation," Sandor said.
   Utah's gay and lesbian advocates hope their larger numbers will lead to acceptance and more political clout.
   "This community has been hidden," Woolf said. "Unlike the ethnic communities, you haven't been able to see us. And a lot of the rhetoric you hear about why we don't deserve equal rights is because we're not seen. We need to be counted and heard."
   Hamilton added: "The structure of the family is changing. But unless we show our numbers, the way the family is defined is never going to change. I don't want to change the value we place on the traditional family, but there needs to be value placed on what we provide, too."
   jbaird@sltrib.com

 

12 July 2001 Thursday

None of the State's Business  - Attorney Brian Barnard is probably right. It will take a lawsuit to end Utah's unused, unnecessary and possibly unconstitutional sodomy law.
   For some reason, the Utah Legislature wants the right to pry into the sexual practices of unmarried people over the age of consent. So the law remains on the books, though ignored until now. A prosecutor in American Fork is pursuing the first criminal case under the law in decades. The charge? An act of consensual oral sex between two teen-agers, one of whom has "an attitude" and the other of whom participated in the "illegal" act.
   By the way, the one with attitude is the only participant being charged. How an outlawed consensual act between two people can only be illegal for one has not been explained by the prosecution.
   While many citizens may not approve of the actions of these two teen-agers, the bigger question is whether government can or should prosecute citizens for consensual sexual practices, particularly when those actions are legal for other citizens. Under Utah law, married couples may do whatever they please. Unmarried couples who, by law, are old enough to consent to sex may only do what the Legislature determines is best for them. They can choose to have sex, but the Legislature will tell them how.
   Outlawing a sexual act between consenting adults will not stop it from happening. The Legislature may not agree with the sexual practices of all citizens, but it has no business agreeing or disagreeing. Unless the act occurs in public or is not consensual, the Legislature and law enforcement should not become involved.
   But Barnard is probably right. Rather than the Legislature repealing the law, it will take prosecution of a consenting adult, a mountain of legal costs and a declaration by the Utah Supreme Court before the sodomy law is finally overturned. What a complete waste of state and personal resources.

 

20 July 2001 Friday

I met Ben Anderson at his place in Los Angeles and drove up to Petaluma to spend the night at the Coast Guard station there since Ben had been in the Coast Guard

 

21 July 2001 Saturday

We left drove out towards Bodega Bay and then went to the Lazy Bear Weekend in Guernsville where we spent the night at the Willows as Ben had book a room. It was fun walking around mainstreet. We didn’t go to anything that cost money as neither one of us had a lot to spare.

 

22 July 2001 Sunday

 

 

We left out early to head back down to Los Angeles where we spent the night at Ben’s place he shared with roommates. This black kid wanted to have sex with me so I did.

Gay Tolerance Good for High-Tech Research shows tech economy strongest in cities with thriving gay communities;  Gay Tolerance Is Good  for High-Tech
BY PAUL BEEBE   THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE  If economist Richard Florida is right, gays may be a key to Gov. Mike Leavitt's vision of a high-tech Utah.
   Florida has constructed a set of measures to gauge the diversity of 50 of the most populated areas in the United States. One  --  the Gay Index  --  turns out to be the best predictor of a region's high-tech success, Florida said.
   "Openness and diversity matter," said Florida, founder of the Software Industry Center at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. His findings were published last month by The Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.
   Florida's theory  --  that the number of gays and lesbians in a city is a barometer of the kind of environment techies thrive in  --  turns conventional economic development strategies upside down at a time when Utah's biggest technology companies, Novell Inc. and Iomega Corp., are struggling. Metro regions such as Salt Lake City typically dangle tax incentives and the availability of capital to lure high-tech employers. But Florida says people in technology businesses brush off such inducements as marginally important.
   He says what companies really want is less apparent: Technology businesses are drawn to communities known for diversity and open-mindedness. Hothouses of people with creativity and ideas, if embraced by civic and business leaders, become fertile ground for people-hungry companies, Florida argues.
   To support his belief, Florida cites Carly Fiorina, chief executive of Hewlett-Packard Co., who told a conference of governors recently, "Keep your tax incentives and highway interchanges. We will go where the highly skilled people are."
   Gateway Inc. is more evidence, Florida says. The No. 2 direct seller of personal computers was established in a South Dakota barn, but for competitive reasons  --  read human capital  --   relocated its headquarters to San Diego, which is No. 5 on the Gay Index. Roy-based Iomega is moving its headquarters to an undisclosed West Coast city to be nearer people who can help develop products that reverse its falling sales.
   "The only thing for cities that really matters is its people climate. The business environment is derivative," Florida said.
   Which could explain why Utah struggles to establish itself as a high-tech center, despite some success stories and well-publicized efforts by Leavitt to shop Utah to the barons of Silicon Valley. Asked his view of Florida's assertion, the governor responded through his press secretary.
   "The focus of our effort is the work of 20 task forces dealing with issues ranging from work-force training to venture-capital funding. Not once in a year and a half of work has this issue been raised," Leavitt spokeswoman Natalie Gochnour said.
   Perhaps not surprisingly, the Salt Lake metro area is near the bottom of Florida's Gay Index. Utah's capital and surrounding towns rank No. 41, while gay-friendly San Francisco is on top.
   "Silicon Valley could really only happen, not only because it is near Stanford University, but because it is in the shadow of San Francisco," Florida said.
   "Gays can be thought of as canaries of the knowledge economy," he added. "They signal a diverse and progressive environment that fosters the creativity and innovation necessary for success in high-tech industry."
   In other words, if gays and lesbians feel at home in Salt Lake, geeks will, too.
   Bjorn Espenes, president and CEO of Infopia Inc., a 2-year-old Salt Lake City company that helps online merchants find electronic marketplaces for their products, says the index seems plausible. While he doesn't embrace the conclusion entirely, Espenes said the study gets at the connection between diversity and competitiveness.
   "The core of the matter is that the more diverse group you have, the more you can compete in the creative process," he said. "If you have a very homogeneous pool of inputs, you get limited input. If you have a wide reference point in everyone's background and experience, it breeds creativity."
   There is evidence that Utah is becoming more hospitable to homosexuals. The Gay Index is based on 1990 census estimates of same-sex households. At the time, the government counted 401 couples of the same sex sharing households in Utah. Ten years later, the number was 2,969, a 740 percent increase over the figures reported in the 1990 census.
   Yet some Utah companies are wary when talking about gays. Novell Inc., the Provo-based software company, encountered criticism last year when it decided to stop matching employee donations to the Boy Scouts of America following a Supreme Court ruling that the organization has a right to exclude gays.
   "Certainly, we would recognize the importance of diversity in attracting employees," Novell spokesman Bruce Lowry said. "Diversity is an important element in creativity and innovations, which is something that any company whose livelihood is based on innovation has to consider."
   Florida does not allege gays and lesbians are overabundant in high-tech firms, although he doesn't rule out the possibility. Citing government figures, he says gay men are 1.3 times more likely to be scientists and engineers than the population in general (lesbians show no greater propensity). Gay men are 2.3 times and lesbians are 1.3 times more likely to be employed in the computer and data processing services industry.
   Despite the growing number of same-sex households in Utah, many gays remain disenchanted with the state.
   Brian Rallison, a member of the Gay Lesbian Business Alliance in Salt Lake City, said " good gays"  --  men and women who seek stable environments that give rise to gay-owned or oriented business districts  --  are leaving Utah in droves. Plenty of support groups exist for gays, but beyond a handful of bars and coffee shops, there is little in the city to make life comfortable for homosexuals, he said.
   "It's hard for people to be who they are," said Rallison, who works  in the mortgage industry. "What is keeping me here is my [three] kids. Work is fine. The [outdoor] lifestyle is fine. But a lot of gays want to live somewhere where they can settle down."
   Rallison, 35, grew up in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. No longer a practicing member, he is at odds with the church over its attitude toward homosexuality  --  that it is a chosen lifestyle, and can be cured through therapy and prayer.
   "I come from an environment that creates homophobia," he said. "It's unintentional. Their intentions are very good, but [church leaders] do not understand" that most gays don't choose their sexual orientation.
   Rallison voted twice for Leavitt, a devout church member. While the governor often speaks about the benefits of diversity to Utah's economy, his louder message trumpets the values of Mormonism  --  thrift, industriousness, education  --  during his Silicon Valley visits.
   Florida said the model that economic planners should follow is exemplified by the Austin, Texas, metropolitan area. Its population of 1.2 million is about the same size as the Salt Lake-Ogden region, yet it ranks No. 3 on the Gay Index and has a large high-tech economy.
   Austin has made significant investments in research and development, higher education and business incubation. But the region also has invested in its lifestyle and music scene to develop a "habitat" that makes it possible to lure companies and people from places such as Silicon Valley, Florida said.
   "That is a message that other cities and regions should heed. Talent powers economic growth, and diversity and openness attract talent," he said. "Companies no longer call the shots. The location decisions of people are just as important  --  potentially more important  --  than those of firms."
   pbeebe@sltrib.com
 

23 July 2001 Monday

Ben and I decided to go to Disneyland since it might be the last time I ever go there. It was a lot of fun and we screamed like little girls on the Space Mountain Ride

26 July 2001 Thursday

Tony Felice [Antonio A. Feliz] will be talking about his book "The issue is pluralism: An urgent call regarding greater pluralsim in civil marriage." The book is a call to the LGBT community about domestic partner marriage. If you are interested in the arguments for and against domestic partners - this is a discussion you shouldn't miss.. Stonewall Coffee Shop-Thursday, July 26th from 7 to 8:30 p.m. Salt Lake City

 

28 July 2001 Saturday


Some Find Leaving the LDS Church Is Difficult Ex-Mormons: Cutting Tie Easier Now BY BOB MIMS      THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE
It had been 12 years since Loyd  Bulkley had been in an LDS  chapel, 10 years since the father of four had divorced and quietly begun a new life as a gay man  --  and long past time, he finally decided, to leave his church.
   So, on May 5, 2000, Bulkley wrote the LDS Church's member records office in Salt Lake City, declaring his resignation. "The only contact I want from the church is written confirmation that my name has been removed from the membership rolls," he wrote.
   What the 50-year-old Murray hairdresser says he got was a letter referring him to local church leaders, followed by more correspondence and a telephone call from a stake president urging him to reconsider at the peril of his eternal soul.
   Bulkley refused. Then came two more letters, one questioning his homosexuality  --  something he had never mentioned in his letter  --  and a second summoning him before a 15-member church disciplinary council.
   Bulkley wrote once more, requesting an uncomplicated removal of his name from church records. Instead, the disciplinary council held a hearing without him, and on June 26, 2000, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints excommunicated him.
   Bulkley says his family cut him off soon after.
   "Thank you very much, Mormon church. For an organization that encourages families being together, they've done a great job on mine," an admittedly embittered Bulkley says today.
   Every year, an unknown fraction of the world's 11 million Mormons write resignation letters. Ex-Mormon activists estimate the number is in the tens of thousands  --  a figure the church says is way too high, while declining to provide more accurate numbers. Some, like Bulkley, resign over the faith's view of homosexual behavior as sinful; others have simply lost their faith, or adopted a new one.
   In the past, only a formal excommunication process could sever one's ties to the church. But in the mid-1980s, the church began allowing simple, non-disciplinary resignations, spelling out the procedure in a seven-paragraph section in the handbook given to lay leaders.
   According to church policy, the individual must write a letter to a bishop, who then forwards it to a stake president for review. If the member does not rescind the request within 30 days, the process moves forward. Eventually, the individual gets a letter confirming membership termination.
   The process does not preclude contact by church leaders  --  in fact, the policy says bishops must make sure the member understands the consequences of his or her action. Church spokesman Dale Bills suggests this contact can be misinterpreted by those wanting to leave.
   "Because removing someone's name from the records of the church cancels all blessings that accompany church membership, the procedure for doing so is carefully administered," he said. "A caring bishop who visits or calls to verify a member's wishes and attempts to soothe hurt feelings is simply doing what the Lord taught  --  showing concern for each member."
   Bills allowed that "in a few instances" name removal requests may, upon review, reveal serious moral or doctrinal transgressions and "formal church discipline is required."
   Beyond a brief statement on the issue, Bills declined to elaborate further.
   Most mainline Christian denominations  --  whether Protestant, Catholic, Episcopalian or Orthodox  --  follow an even simpler process. A mere request, verbal or written, suffices to be excised from parish or congregational rolls.
   Utah Episcopal Bishop Carolyn Tanner Irish said membership is an open-ended arrangement in her faith. People are free to come and go without being contacted, she said.
   The LDS Church, on the other hand, keeps extensive membership records, which follow members from ward to ward, city to city and across states. That efficient tracking system makes it difficult for people wanting to leave the church to merely slip away.
   For some Mormons, such as Victoria McGowan, resigning from the LDS Church has meant months or years of frustration.
   The 41-year-old divorced mother of five in Paducah, Ky., says her July 1999 LDS resignation letter ushered in 13 months of delays, unwanted visits from fellow Mormons urging her to recant, and what she interpreted as harassing calls and even a veiled threat from a local bishop.
   "He told me that bad things tend to happen to people who try to push this issue, leaving the church," McGowan said.
   Finally, she says, she called Gregory Dodge, supervisor of the LDS Church's membership records office in Salt Lake City. McGowan said he seemed genuinely concerned about the purported harassment and her threat of legal action if it did not stop.
   The incidents did cease, and last August  --  13 months after her initial resignation letter  --  she received a letter from the church confirming she was off the rolls.
   Dodge declined to discuss McGowan's or any other membership termination request, citing church confidentiality policies. He referred all further questions to Bills.
   In fact, not all who seek to leave the LDS Church find the process painful. Rachel, a 25-year-old Indianapolis woman who asked that her last name be withheld to spare her largely Mormon family, found the procedure "relatively simple.
   "Everyone who leaves isn't bitter or has a difficult time," said Rachel, who left because she no longer believed LDS teachings. "I was raised by my parents to be honest, and having my name taken off was simply being honest with the church."
   Still, Rachel's request took four months to process. Her first resignation letter, sent in January 1999, was reported lost. She sent a second, certified letter to her bishop, who called to make sure of her decision, then relayed the request to church headquarters. In October 1999, Rachel received confirmation she was off membership records.
   "Delays are the least of the problems I hear about," said Kathy Worthington, a Salt Lake City postal clerk who was excommunicated at her request on grounds of disbelief 20 years ago.
   People visiting her Mormon No More Web site (mormonnomore.com) complain of being asked to resubmit their letters, delays in processing their requests, unsolicited calls and visits, and being called in for interviews or disciplinary hearings.
   Worthington said her online sampling reflects only "a miniscule percentage" of those trying to leave. But even if the numbers of those who feel harassed are just in the hundreds, that is still too many, she said.
   bmims@sltrib.com

 

29 July 2001 Sunday


All-Powerful Panel Claims Alcohol as Its Fiefdom-ABC's Power Not So Absolute, Ruling Implies BY GREG BURTON   THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE
In one of many routine days at the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, a compliance officer tossed a newspaper catering to Utah's gay and lesbian community on his secretary's desk.
   The Paper Moon private club was advertising a night for customers to "party til you drop" and "admire her bust."    Despite no mention of alcohol in the ad, Utah's liquor commission eventually fined Paper Moon $2,700 and ordered a three-day suspension of alcohol sales, ruling the seven words in the advertisement were an illegal solicitation of membership and an inducement to overconsume, in violation of Utah Code.
   Four years later, in March of this year, 3rd District Judge Leslie Lewis overturned the decision, finding little evidence to support the commission's extreme response. Lewis was especially concerned about ABC's investigation: It made just one phone call.
   "If the state has an interest in taking care of what they perceive to be an alcohol situation  --  an improper incentive to get people to overindulge, a viable [interest], a worthwhile one  --  then why wouldn't somebody go down to the Paper Moon and try to purchase a beer?" Lewis asked. "They didn't even have to drink it."
   The answer is simple, critics say: They don't have to. Utah's Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission is so powerful and the state's anti-alcohol advertising laws so broad that even minor infractions can bring severe punishment.
   As a result, advertisers and bar owners have developed their own system of self-censorship, subjugating the First Amendment to avoid a dogfight with a much bigger dog.
   The Paper Moon's four-year legal fight is proof, critics contend, that Utah is overly  --  and unconstitutionally  --  obsessive about controlling alcohol sales and promotion.
   Why else, they ask, would Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a Mormon who doesn't drink because his religion teaches it is wrong, stock the five-member ABC Commission with four Mormons and only one social drinker?
   But ABC's authority to police alcohol was dealt a severe blow this past week when the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered an injunction on two fundamental provisions in Utah law: a prohibition on ads that "induce persons to buy liquor" and a ban on liquor and price-list displays that can been seen by passers-by outside an establishment.
   The injunction, though, is temporary. If a trial ever takes place in the underlying lawsuit, the two provisions could be reinstated by Utah U.S. District Judge David Sam, although plaintiff attorney Brian Barnard says an appeal of any decision by Sam that veers from the 10th Circuit opinion would be swift.
   "ABC has so much power they don't have to be rational, they don't have to be fair," says Barnard, who challenged ABC's advertising laws in 1996 on behalf of a group of club and tavern owners, Catalyst magazine and Wayne Benson, an individual.
   "They go off the deep end. Licensees are absolutely terrified and won't buck them."
   Peace of Mind: Instead, they trade advertising freedom for peace of mind.
   Todd Dayley, publisher of The Pillar, which ran the offending Paper Moon advertisement, now faxes questionable ads to ABC before printing, "and they fax it back with a stamp and a signature."
   In one instance, Dayley pulled an ad that offended an ABC compliance officer because it showed a man pinching the nipple of another man.
   "We ran a picture of a Christmas Tree instead," he said.
   "It's like censorship, but we do it more to protect our clients because we don't want them to close down."
   ABC compliance manager Earl Dorius defends the pre-publication give-and-take as a service to bar owners.
   "It's not something we pursue, it's something the club owners come to us with. There's nothing wrong with that."
   National Media: Meanwhile, as ABC quibbles with corner taverns and dance clubs over their advertising, a flood of more provocative ads in national newspapers and magazines whet Utah's drinking appetites.
   In a recent issue of Entertainment Weekly, a woman, shown from the waist down in a see-through pink negligee and black panties, lovingly grips a fifth of Skyy Vodka.
   In Time magazine, the proprietors of Jack Daniels bourbon implore the reader to settle back with a glass "sometime soon." Maker's Mark suggests a "skinny dip" with a fifth of booze.
   Until the 10th Circuit 's ruling, such ads were banned from publications produced in Utah.
   Even after the ruling, alcohol advertising remains " 'chilled' by . . . vague provisions" in Utah's code, say editors at Salt Lake City's Catalyst.
   'Drinking Scene': For instance, it is against Utah law to show a "drinking scene," and it is a violation of ABC's rules  --  which carry the same force as law  --  to promote happy hours or advertise free food. Clubs also are forbidden to promote the legally required memberships to their establishments. And when ads run on radio, television or in the print media, ABC requires they be crafted exclusively "for the members" of the private club.
   Furthermore, highway billboards touting a private club are banned by ABC rule because the commission believes such advertising is "public solicitation . . . calculated to increase membership."
   Most of the rules are subject to interpretation and designed to discourage anything edgy or creative, says Greta Belanger deJong, editor and publisher of Catalyst.
   For the magazine's June issue, Native Wines of Mount Pleasant replaced an advertisement touting the "fine art of wine making" because an ABC employee said it may be illegal.
   "People are self-policing themselves like mad," she says. "But the laws are so fuzzy. If the ABC has to say to themselves that it may be illegal, it means even they can't figure it out."
   The state's prohibition against liquor advertising persists even in the face of a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Rhode Island ban on the advertising of liquor prices.
Soften Policy: After that ruling, Utah's ABC agreed to soften its policy against beer advertising, clearing the way for corner grocers and tavern owners to market Budweiser like they do bread or dancing.
   The 10th Circuit has suddenly raised the ante: challenging the commission's remaining bans against advertising for private clubs, hard liquor and wine.
   At issue is a fundamental premise of Utah's strict control of liquor: shielding teetotalers.
   If this premise falls, drinkers may no longer have to blindly navigate their way to a sip of alcohol, Barnard says.
   According to the 10th Circuit, "Protecting nondrinkers cannot constitute a substantial state interest justifying Utah's speech restriction."
   "Rule by intimidation has been the pattern forever and ever at ABC," Barnard says. "But now, although some people may find alcohol offensive, the [10th Circuit] is saying that isn't a good reason for legislating silence."
   gburton@sltrib.com

 

 

AUGUST 2001

1 August 2001Wednesday

 Round Table: Gays' Needs Within Faiths  The National Religious Leadership Roundtable, an interfaith network of leaders of faith-based organizations and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities, is conducting its semiannual meeting in Salt Lake City this week and will hold a public event tonight.    The event, planned for 7 p.m. at St. James Episcopal Church, 7500 S. 1300 East, will focus on the needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender youths within religious communities.    "Free to Be: A Forum on Spiritual Discovery, Not Sexual Recovery for GLBT Youth" will feature a conversation with a Mormon family whose homosexual son attempted suicide a year ago.  
   The round table meeting began Tuesday and will continue through Thursday.
The task force said the round table chose to meet in Salt Lake City "to challenge anti-gay attitudes" in Utah.
   --  Ashley Estes

2 August 2001 Thursday

Roundtable: Love Is Better Than Therapy  Thursday, August 2,  2001 BY BOB MIMS THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE  MIDVALE -- Participants in the National Religious Leadership Roundtable were  told that unconditional love, understanding and acceptance are the best  remedies for teens struggling with sexual identity, not so-called "reparative  therapy."

Such schemes, aimed at reversing gay or lesbian tendencies, can serve as vehicles for self-deception. Youths enrolled in them are set up for failure,

depression and sometimes even suicide, about 100 people attending the

interfaith group's semiannual meeting were told Wednesday night.

The Rev. Lee Shaw of the hosting St. James Episcopal Church said the

Washington, D.C.-based NRLR's choice of predominantly Mormon and

pro-traditional family Utah, where a number of reparative therapy programs

flourish, was especially timely.

"All too often in our particular state, issues around sexuality, especially

with young people, are hidden," Shaw said. "They are not dealt with in a way

that is helpful for anyone -- the young person, their friends, their families

or their religious institutions."

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints considers homosexual activity grounds for excommunication, and reparative therapy programs have gained the faith's tacit support. However, reparative therapy does not enjoy the backing of Affirmation International, a group for gay, lesbian, bisexual and

transgender Mormons.

Duane Jennings, a Salt Lake City leader of Affirmation International, said

only the support of friends, loved ones and one's religious community brings

true peace for young people who discover their preference is for members of

the same sex.

"It is my experience that those who are able to heal spiritually are able to

step away from the self-loathing that people have been taught [and] into a

place of personal power and wholeness," Jennings said.

That was the case for Judd Hardy, who "came out" at age 13 to his parents, Salt Lake City attorney and former Mormon bishop David Hardy and his wife, Carly.

At first, the Hardys enrolled their son in a reparative therapy program, but

it did not work. When Judd attempted suicide, the Hardys decided to embrace

their son and his gay orientation.

Judd, now a 19-year-old New York University student, said it was his family's "unconditional love" that helped him recover from his depression and accept himself.

"It's definitely been a journey for our family," he said. "We have broken

down ideas about our religion and what a child should be, what our family

should look like. And family is your refuge, when you need to be accepted and

understood."

 

A Call To Action by The Rev. Elder Troy D. Perry  UFMCC Founder and Moderator  Today, I am joining hands with the al-Fatiha Foundation, Amnesty

International, and the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission

to designate August 15 as an "International Day of Mourning and Solidarity."

Let me explain: People of conscience around the world have been shocked at the treatment of 54 men arrested by the Egyptian government on May 11, 2001, solely because of their sexual orientation. These men have been detained in prison since their  arrest, officially charged with "immoral behavior" and "contempt of [Moslem] religion." Their trials are slated to resume in Cairo on August 15.  I concur with the analysis of the al-Fatiha Foundation, a leading

organization for LGBT Moslems, and Amnesty International, that the majority,

if not all, of these men have been detained solely on the grounds of their

alleged sexual orientation. As such they are prisoners of conscience.  We are especially distressed by reports that these men were ill-treated during their arrest and tortured during the first days of their detention. To date, Egyptians authorities have not investigated these inquiries and government officials have refused to respond to humanitarian inquiries. These actions place Egypt in violation of the International Covenant on Civil  and Political Rights, of which Egypt is a signatory.  Accordingly, I have proposed five "action steps" which individuals and

organizations can take, and am asking:  -- That prayers be offered for these 54 men and their families during public  worship services in MCC congregations and all houses of faith on Saturday,  August 11 and Sunday, August 12, and that information on these human rights violations by shared with congregants on that day.  -- That Wednesday, August 15 be recognized by UFMCC congregations, and by all  people of goodwill, as an "International Day of Mourning and Solidarity" on behalf of those facing anti-gay persecution and imprisonment in Egypt. -- That local activists around the world consider holding public

demonstrations in solidarity with the persecuted Egyptians, and use the press

and media to call attention to their plight. Ideas for such events may be

obtained by contacting the al-Fatiha Foundation That letters and phone calls be sent to Egyptian embassies around the world asking for the immediate and unconditional release of these 54 prisoners. (See addresses below.) -- That you forward this Action Alert to your friends, and to e-mail lists and listservs to which you belong, in order to focus the world's attention upon this injustice. When I spoke before the al-Fatiha Foundation gathering of LGBT Moslems in San Francisco in June, I spoke these words, "Just as UFMCC has challenged the Christian church to take a fresh look at the societal and personal prejudices which have crept into Christian theology, I encourage you to challenge Islam on their stands on gays and lesbians. It is only through working together in this way that you will change the attitude of Islamic countries concerning gays and lesbians living in those cultures." The current crisis in Egypt provides an opportunity for us to join hands with our Moslem brothers and sisters to further the cause of social and spiritual justice for all people. /signed/ The Rev. Elder Troy D. Perry Founder and Moderator The Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Church  A C T I O N

UFMCC endorses the following action proposed by Amnesty International.

Please write letters to Egyptian authorities that: -- Express your concern at the ongoing detention of these men; -- Inform them that we believe these men are detained solely on the grounds of their alleged sexual orientation; - Communicate that if people are detained solely on account of their sexual orientation, we join with Amnesty International in considering them prisoners of conscience and call for their immediate and unconditional release -- Express your concern at the allegations of torture and ill-treatment during arrest and detention and call on the authorities to conduct prompt investigations into these serious allegations. Letters should be addressed to: Counsellor Maher 'Abd al-Wahid Public Prosecutor Dar al-Qadha al-'Ali Ramses Street Cairo, Egypt

 

 

4 August 2001 Saturday

Gathering in Midvale tackles gay issues  By Jerry Johnston, Deseret News staff writer  David Hardy says he never dreamed same-sex attraction would become his cause.  Just as he never dreamed a photo of his gay son, Judd, would be

featured in the current issue of Newsweek or that his once-devout LDS family

would be the toast of a gay and lesbian religious discussion.  But such was the case on Wednesday when the Hardys, who hail from Salt Lake City, joined about a hundred local and national religious leaders and lay members at St. James Episcopal Church in Midvale for a forum on "Spiritual Discovery." In a format that blended talk-show casualness with an old-fashioned town meeting, participants discussed ways to "help people understand the diversity of creation," "keep young people from being beaten up by the Bible" and "invite the presence of the divine into the room."  Several comments were greeted with warm, spontaneous applause. Sponsored by several gay and lesbian organizations, the semiannual National Religious Leadership Roundtables are spiritual discussions held in politically charged cities -- such as Miami during the Dade County human

rights debates and Colorado Springs, home of James Dobson's Focus on the

Family program, where the group hoped to "challenge the right wing at its

doorstep."  The NRLR came to Salt Lake City at the bidding of Duane Jennings

of Affirmation International for Gay & Lesbian Mormons.  Jennings said his

goal was to "address the hateful things that have been said" and "move a

spirit-based dialogue into the greater community."  Among the participants were Robert F. Mialovich of Dignity/USA and Kay Whitlock of the American Friends Service Committee, along with the Rev. Silvia R. Behrend of First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, Father Lee Shaw of St. James Episcopal and other local clergy. The focus, however, was squarely on the Hardys and their sons. David Hardy said when he learned Judd, now 19, was gay "I strapped on my seatbelt.   

I knew I was in for an interesting ride." Eventually, the former LDS

bishop, whose family has now left the church, asked himself, "Are you going

to hold on to the dogma, or take a step in a direction that is really scary?"

He took the step. Today, he says, "The one thing I've learned through all

this is how much I don't know."

Afterwards, Carlie Hardy spoke with the Deseret News about her family's

new high profile. For one thing, she felt the photograph of Judd in Newsweek

made him look sinister. When asked if she worries the national spotlight may

rattle Judd -- who once attempted suicide -- she says, "We're not doing this.

He is."

David Hardy spoke in more philosophical terms, discussing his years in

Washington, D.C., before African-Americans received the LDS priesthood.

"There have always been a number of issues that I've had to take on

faith and lock in the back of my mind," he said. But this, he said, was not

one.

"I don't think what we're doing will create change," he said, "though

we may give some people some sleepless nights."

As for Judd, he told the gathering, "We've broken down the idea of what

a family should look like . . . . I've always been told I was among the

select.  I still believe it."

The comment drew a burst of spontaneous applause.

E-mail: jerjohn@desnews.com

 

11 August 2001 Saturday

Meaning of Marriage: Gay Unions Endorsed by Few Churches  BY BOB MIMS THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE  In many ways, it was an old-fashioned courtship. After five months of dating, Ted Clayton, a lonely Salt Lake City trucking company dispatcher, was convinced he had found his soul mate.  So, on a sunny spring day in April 2000, Clayton pocketed the engagement ring he had bought at ZCMI and took his beloved on a walk along the Jordan River Parkway that he hoped would end with an eloquent proposal and an enthusiastic "yes." "We had talked about getting married, and it was time to ask," Clayton recalled. "It was a Sunday afternoon and we went for a walk. But I was very nervous." Try as he might, Clayton couldn't get his proposal past a seemingly constricted throat. Finally, his intended took the initiative. "He had said, 'Let's go over and sit on that bench. I have something for you.' But then all he could say over and over was, 'I'm kind of nervous,''' Manuel Maravi says with a laugh, gently touching his spouse of 10 months on the arm. "So, I just said, 'I will.' " True to their shared Mormon upbringings, the couple did not move into their southeast Salt Lake City condominium together until after they had exchanged their vows. Due to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' unswerving condemnation of same-sex marriages, they turned to gay-affirming Holladay United Church of Christ for their rites. And so, on Oct. 21, 2000, decked out in black tuxedos at Salt Lake City's All Saints Episcopal Church, Clayton, 33, and Maravi, a 29-year-old pianist from Buenos Aires, recited covenant vows before Holladay UCC lay minister Pat Gamble. Gamble was out of town this week, but her senior pastor, the Rev. Richard Waddell, said UCC ministers have come to view same-sex commitment rites on an equal footing with traditional heterosexual marriages. "I would approach it the same way I would dealing with any couple seeking to make a commitment to each other," he said. "It is a lifetime commitment to be there for each other." Clayton and Maravi took their commitment a step further, however. Two days later, under a recently enacted statute in Vermont, the couple were joined in a civil ceremony. In an October 1998 statement still cited by church officials on gay issues, LDS Church President Gordon B. Hinckley declared that God-ordained marriage was only between a man and a woman. He indicated that while homosexual desires are not sin, those who act upon them risk excommunication. "We want to help these people, to strengthen them, to assist them with their problems," Hinckley said. "But we cannot stand idle if they indulge in immoral activity." Clayton and Maravi, wishing for the heavenly sanction the faith of their youth would not give, turned to Holladay UCC, one of several Protestant denominations that perform same-sex unions. "We had the religious ceremony because spirituality is important to both of us," said Clayton. "It was a symbol to God of our commitment to one another and to the community at large that this wasn't something we entered into lightly." The subsequent same-sex civil ceremony, legal in Vermont since a law signed by Gov. Howard Dean took effect July 1, 2000, is not valid outside the state. Indeed, while dozens of same-sex union ceremonies are performed in several of Utah's gay-affirming churches every year, the state, and many others, have declared the unions void. Still, the couple say the civil union was important. "Even though it is just in Vermont and not Utah, at least we know that in some part of the world we are recognized as a couple," Maravi said. Added Clayton: "I don't see it as different [from heterosexual marriage]. We just want to live our lives with a partner, be a family and perhaps adopt children some day. We live our lives, we go to church, go on vacations, whatever. We're just a normal couple." H. Wayne Schow, an Idaho State University emeritus professor of English and a Mormon, sees Clayton and Maravi as a good argument for both governmental and religious institutions -- including his own faith -- to sanction committed same-sex relationships. "I have seen some fine examples of seriously committed, monogamous gay relationships and I think it is a crime we don't give them support," said Schow, who is to deliver a paper on the topic this morning at 10 a.m. at the Sunstone Symposium, an independent forum for LDS-related inquiry. The symposium is being held at the WestCoast Hotel in Salt Lake City.

In his paper, "Assessing Committed Same-Sex Unions: Can a Theological

Accommodation be Made," Schow contends that whether due to mere biology or

divine intent, a segment of the human family is "different in the nature of

the deepest intimacy they seek with another." Whatever the cause of same-sex attraction, he notes that it has, does and will continue to exist. Mormons must eventually accept that, Schow contends, and consider how best to minister to the gays and lesbians amongst them. "Do we care enough about the well-being of our homosexual brothers and sisters to allow them a socially- approved supporting structure of love and acceptance and security such as married heterosexuals enjoy?" he asks. Schow believes that such a rapprochement between the LDS Church and its gay and lesbian members may have helped prevent the death of his son, Brad, from AIDS in 1986. "A true Christian vision of his personal uniqueness . . . could have encouraged and supported him to find the better path of a committed relationship," he said. Schow readily admits that he, too, "lacked the vision and courage to stand up for him" during the critical period when his son's search for love took him into the gay community. "But it is not too late now to help others like him," Schow declared. Schow's views aside, it appears unlikely that same-sex marriages will gain ground in religious circles -- other than in a minority of liberal congregations such as the UCC, some Quakers, Unitarian-Universalists and Reform Judaism -- anytime soon. The Roman Catholic Church, the LDS Church and America's fundamentalist, evangelical Christian core remain opposed to endorsing gay unions. Still, Clayton and Maravi say there are many others like them, gay men who long for the sanction of society and heaven for committed, life-long domestic partnerships. For them, they accept the responsibility of being role models for such seekers. "For someone dreaming of having a gay family or committed relationship, at

least they can see from us that it is possible," Maravi said. Softly smiling at his companion, Clayton said he looks forward to growing old with Maravi, whose exuberance and zest for life is a perfect complement to his own more reserved nature. "We know relationships aren't always easy," Clayton said. "But the

ceremonies will remind us [that] when tough times come along, we know we

are committed to each other, and that this is for the rest of our lives."

bmims@sltrib.com

 

17 August 2001 Friday

Gay and Lesbian Day held at Lagoon amusement park; Sunday, meet at front of park at 12:45 p.m. to get discount passes; or meet the group later in the park. All are welcome.

 

26 August 2001Sunday

Suazo's Legacy  A hush went across the state Senate Chamber as SB37, the Hate Crimes Bill, was introduced to the Senate floor. Listening to the debate, I felt a surge of pride when Sen. Pete Suazo rose in favor of the bill. At that very instance I knew that Utah would never be same, for Sen. Suazo had successfully pioneered a place for minorities in the state Legislature.   As a former youth activist, lobbyist, and intern, I appreciate both the heartache and hours he devoted. As a homosexual, I am eternally grateful for the tolerance and unconditional love that he showed throughout his legislative career. Undoubtedly, the name Sen. Pete Suazo will be unparalleled in Utah politics.   ZAKREY COON    Salt Lake City

27 Monday

28 Tuesday

29 Wednesday

30 Thursday

31 Friday

 

SEPTEMBER 2001

3  September 2001 Monday

Labor Day

 

11 September 2001 Tuesday

Amaerica was attacked by Muslim terrorist today flying planes into the New York Trade Towers and the Pentagon. When I got up this morning and was listening to the Radio From Hell show Bill Allred was excited saying all hell was breaking lose in New York! I turned on the regular news and saw that the World Trade Tower had a jet fly into it and no one was sure if it was an accident but then news reported a second jet plane flew into the second tower so it had to be an attack.  I had to get dress and drive into work and at Orchard all the faculty was gathered around the radio in the Leanne Ungers office glued to the news until we had to go to our classes.  It was so surreal and I watched the news during my lunch break and there had been an attack on the Pentagon and a plane crash in Pennsylvania that was suspected of being diverted to Washington. As soon as school let out I hurried home and watched the news and the horrible scenes of the World Trade Towers collapsing.  All flights in America were grounded but the Saudis who were here were allowed to fly out. Rumors are everwhere that the Saudi terrorists were responsible with al Qaeda. They expect over 3,000 people were killed in the attacks.  Its unbelieveable this could happen.

14 September 2001 Friday

JERRY FALWELL BLAMES GAYS/OTHERS FOR TERRORIST ATTACK  A Soulforce Response: Once Again, Jerry Falwell Advances Our Cause  Mel White  September 14, 2001 This morning, before sunrise, our 800 line lit up with calls wanting a Soulforce response to Jerry Falwell's comments blaming gays and lesbians for the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.Immediately,I checked the Washington Blade web page for more information.  Apparently, on Thursday morning, September 13, in one of his rare guest appearances on Pat Robertson's 700 Club, Falwell placed "a lot of the blame [for the destructive hijackings]" on the Federal Courts "for throwing God out of the public square" and on his usual list of those "who have tried to secularize America: pagans, abortionists, feminists, gays and lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, and People for the American Way." With Pat Robertson nodding his ascent, Jerry Falwell explained the tragedies in New York City and Washington, D.C., as proof that "God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve." After his comments came under fire, the Washington Post called Falwell who placed "all the blame legally and morally on the actions of the terrorist, "but he explained that America's secular and anti-Christian environment left us open to our Lord's [decision] not to protect.  When a nation deserts God and expels God from the culture the result is not good." Later in the day, on a CNN talk show, Jerry Falwell apologized for his remarks.  Apologize or not, before we waste too much anger on the words of Jerry or Pat, let's consider the probable consequences of their politics of blame. First, it was gratifying to learn that the White House immediately issued a statement calling Falwell's remarks "inappropriate" with a clear advisory that the "The President does not share those views." By frustrating the President's call for national unity during these most difficult days, Jerry and Pat have lost even more political clout and public credibility.  And I am grateful every time the President has cause to distance himself from leaders of the extremist right.  Second, I'm guessing that in the next few weeks, clergy and lay leaders alike from every faith tradition will distance themselves from Jerry and Pat's unwise and untimely dialogue increasing their isolation from the mainstream Christian community as well.  Third, many of our families and friends who are still confused by Jerry, Pat, and others who misuse the "clobber passages" to caricature and condemn us, will be shocked by this theological premise that God, let alone God's gay and lesbian children, could have anything at all to do with the terrorist's despicable acts. A member of my own family, with deep religious roots called Jerry's remarks, "The most ridiculous thing I've ever heard."  Every time Fred Phelps and his family appear at one of our Soulforce  Direct Actions carrying his "GOD HATES FAGS" signs, I am grateful. Once again, Jerry and Pat have joined Fred on the frontlines of ignorance and bigotry and I'm convinced that their words will help our  cause. That's the good news.  The bad news is that Jerry and Pat genuinely believe that the acceptance of sexual and gender minorities will lead to God's judgment and wrath against our nation.  Jerry and Pat are not phony. They are fundamentalist Christians and like fundamentalist Muslims, Hindus, and Jews, fundamentalist  Christians are known by their "urge to purge." They believe they are called to "cleanse" society of all they find "unclean" and by cleansing society they will "save it."  Osama bin Laden is a Muslim fundamentalist. He believes that Allah wills him to destroy America, "the Great Satan."  He is convinced that his war against our nation is Jihad ("holy war"). The terrorists who hijacked the planes and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were convinced that Allah will reward them for their sacrifice.  Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell are fundamentalist Christians. They  believe that they are called by God to cleanse this nation of sexual minorities (and pagans, feminists, abortionists, etc.) and thus to save it. They believe that those who advocate the acceptance of sexual minorities (and other liberal causes) are an "abomination in God's sight" and must be converted or purged.  And though Pat and Jerry have never called for violence against these "enemies of God" at least one of the biblical verses they misuse regularly to condemn sexual minorities states clearly that we are "¦worthy of death and should be executed, (Leviticus 20)." And though I am convinced that their extremist remarks are isolating them from the American mainstream, I am still deeply concerned about the consequences of the antigay jihad or holy war that Robertson, Falwell and the other spiritual extremists (terrorists) are waging against us. Their daily misuse of a handful of Biblical verses to condemn sexual and gender minorities still confuses good people of faith across the nation.  Those good people of faith who have been convinced that homosexuality is a sickness, a sin, and a threat to the nation, are now waging war against us in and through their mainstream

Roman Catholic and Protestant churches to deny us our religious and

our political rights and protections. Following the guidelines of relentless nonviolent resistance (as taught by Gandhi and King), Soulforce volunteers are committed to taking our stand against the untruth that leads to suffering and death for God's lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender children.  And

though we are convinced that the extremist language of Pat and Jerry

and the others will eventually turn the entire nation against them, we

are determined to confront their untruth relentlessly with the truth that God created lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender children and loves them exactly as they were created.

 

29 September 2001 Saturday

CLEANUP & PLANTING AT MEMORY GROVE Members of the Gay and Lesbian Community may remember with fondness two venerable institutions, which were destroyed on August 11, 1999.  The Sun Tavern and Memory Grove Park.  A freak tornado destroyed both and while the Sun never recovered, Memory Grove Park will rise again. On Saturday, September 29, you can join other Utah gays and lesbians at the park from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. and help us make Memory Grove live again. Created in 1924 by a group of mothers known as the Service Star Legion,  Memory Grove was to be a memorial to those who fought and died in the Great  War, as World War I was called. It was meant to be a place of quiet and peace and over the years it also came to memorialize the dead of World War II and even the Korean and Vietnam Wars. Unfortunately the years since 1924 have not been kind to Memory Grove. Money to maintain the park became tighter, many of the monuments were vandalized and it became a somewhat dangerous place to be. In 1983 a flood tore through City Creek Canyon and caused severe damage. Memorial House was closed and

became almost a derelict. The beautiful Meditation Chapel built in 1948 was padlocked, its stained glass windows riddled with bullet holes.  In 1993 the Utah Heritage Foundation, looking for a larger home, restored, remodeled and moved into Memorial House. The first floor reception center was reopened and became a popular place for meetings, parties and wedding receptions. In 1996 the Memory Grove Foundation was formed to begin the process of restoring the memorial monuments within the Grove. The Meditation Chapel was completed restored and rededicated on Veterans Day, November 11, 1998. Slowly the public started coming back into the park.  Then the greatest catastrophe of all hit Memory Grove. On August 11, 1999 a tornado completely devastated Memory Grove uprooting or breaking nearly 500 memorial trees most of which had been planted and dedicated in remembrance of lost loved ones.  To see the aftermath brought tears to the eyes of all who cared about Memory Grove.  Two years of planning and fundraising ensued. At last, in June of 2001, Salt Lake City Corporation began Phase I of the rebuilding of Memory Grove. Extensive work is to be done- new irrigation systems, thousands of new trees and planting, restoration of the steps and paths leading to the State Capital, new ADA walkways to the Meditation Chapel and removal of remaining pieces of war machinery to leave only the monuments built to honor humanity lost to war. Why are we telling you this?  The Gay and Lesbian Community has always been active in helping the wider community though civic service. We are looking to you for your help in additional restoration activities that are not currently part of the Phase I plan for Memory Grove.  Two weeks ago, after cocktails, I made Chad Keller walk up into Memory Grove. I showed him the Meditation Chapel Plaza that needs to be weeded and cared for. He immediately negotiated with a new, local Gay organization to adopt and care for Meditation Chapel year round. I showed him the area where a rose garden once existed near the World War I monument. I am happy to say that negotiations will shortly begin with Utah’s oldest Gay and Lesbian Social Organization to replant the area in honor of their past presidents.  I showed him the Austin Steps and the trails leading up to A Street and we agreed that adopting these areas would further protect them from loss and decay.  I showed him the Gold Star Mothers Monument, a new monument paid for by the Memory Grove Foundation, and he said we better put that on the adoption list too. Chad has never been one to shrink from a challenge. Nor is he afraid to ask anyone for help or contributions for projects which bring together and improve the Gay and Lesbian Community. Here’s the deal. Come help us clean up the area around the Gold Star Mothers Monument, plant spring bulbs and clean up the trails leading from the Austin Steps to A Street. (I understand that the Austin Steps and these trails were once very special to a certain popular drag queen.) The Salt Lake City Parks Department will provide tools and bulbs to plant. If you have any plants or bulbs you would like to contribute, please bring them with you. Lunch will be provided and Unity Utah is trying to get our local candidates for office to work with the community on this project. It’s a perfect chance to ask questions of the candidates.  Give us your time from 9 A.M. to 2 P.M.  on Saturday, September 29th and become a part of Memory Grove again. There will be something special for the first 100 volunteers. Refreshments will also be provided. Please help us make Memory Grove live again.

 

30 September 2001Sunday

The Salt Lake Men's Choir will have our fall Concert on Sunday, September 30 at 7:30 in the Jeanne' Wagner Theatre (138 W Broadway)  The concert is entitled "Seasons of Love" and is a programme of music that deals with different kinds of love:  romantic love, familial love, love of God, of home, of country, etc.  Our special guests include the Salt Lake Community College Dance Company, directed by Tess Boone and noted SLC photographer Whitney King.  But in light of this months terrible events, we have decided to donate half of the proceeds of this concert to the American Red Cross, to help the victims and their families.  Can you help us spread the word?  Now, more than ever, we need to share our message of diversity and acceptance--I worry that our country may decend into xenophobia and racism, and we want to add our voices to the support of the fallen, to the need of unity and love--these unbelievable acts came from hate and

intolerance and should be answered with measured justice, not revenge against equally innocent people.  We raise our voices in love. Thanks for all your support.

Jonathan president Salt Lake Men's Choir Tickets are available through ArtTix and are $15.00 general admission and $10.00 students and seniors.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Years 1951-1955 Presidents Truman and Eisenhower

  Childhood Memories 1951 to 1959 Preface   My mother was born in a four-room house near the town of Shamrock in Wheeler County Texas  on a ...